Quality Criteria Form
Criteria | Requirements | Data/Evidence |
---|---|---|
Criterion 1 |
||
Program-level learning outcomes for all programs of instruction are set, are consistent with the college mission and the programs' intended purpose, and are appropriate for the credential offered upon successful completion of the program. |
1.1 Learning outcomes set for all programs of instruction are: 1.1.1 consistent with the mission of the college; 1.2 Clear statements of learning outcomes exist for all programs offered by the college, and are communicated effectively to students and faculty. 1.3 Program learning outcomes are operationally meaningful in that they: 1.4 Student requirements and obligations stated for each program are derived from, and flow coherently from, the program's stated learning outcomes. 1.5 Program learning outcomes are consistent with the
credential granted, the title of the credential awarded, the
provincial program standards (where they exist), and the 1.5.1 reflected in the course outlines; and, 1.6 Program learning outcomes are consistent with MTCU 1.7 Program learning outcomes are regularly reviewed to ensure they remain relevant, and changes are made when necessary, including consequential changes to programs, courses, and assessments. 1.8 The capabilities of program graduates, including knowledge, understanding, skills, and attitudes are consistent with the intended program learning outcomes. |
1.1.01 - New Program Quality Policy |
Criterion 2 |
||
Admission, credit for prior learning, promotion, graduation, and related academic policies support program development and student achievement of program learning outcomes. |
2.1 Applicant and student requirements and obligations are clearly stated, communicated, and accessible, including: 2.1.1 requirements for admission to the program and to courses in the program; 2.2 Clear statements of program learning outcomes are developed and used as a starting point in new program development. 2.3 Appropriate credits are allocated for each component of the program, and transfer and laddering options are stated. 2.4 Academic practices and policies govern program structure, including any specific pre- and co-requisites, mandatory and optional/elective components, practical/work-based components, alternative entry and exit points. 2.5 Changes to courses and program outcomes are introduced on a timely basis and are designed to maintain the relevance of the program. |
Students will benefit from a clear statement of what they are expected to achieve in their studies. Faculty will benefit from a clear statement of the objective to which their teaching and learning support is to lead. Employers will benefit from a clear statement of what they can expect from graduates recruited by them. 2.1.01a - Admission Requirements - CVT |
Criterion 3 |
||
Programs conform to the Framework for Programs of Instruction and the Credentials Framework, are consistent with accepted college system nomenclature / titling principles, and maintain relevance. |
3.1 The structure of the program is consistent with the program learning outcomes. 3.2 The length of the program is appropriate to the level of the program outcomes. 3.3 Academic practices and policies govern program structure, including any specific pre- and co-requisites, mandatory and optional/elective components, practical/work-based components, alternative entry and exit points, and are consistent with program learning outcomes. 3.4 Program title is consistent with college system nomenclature / titling principles. |
3.1.01a - Curriculum Map CVT – Example 1 |
Criterion 4 |
||
Methods of program delivery and student evaluation are consistent with the program learning outcomes. |
4.1 Program delivery, including that which takes place off-site, is consistent with the nature of the program, the learning outcomes, and the needs of the students. 4.2 Academic policies and practices provide for assessments and appeals, and ensure that: 4.2.1 evaluation methods are aligned with course outcomes, are valid, and are reliable; 4.3 Academic policies and practices that provide for the development and continuous improvement of teaching and learning methods are valued, documented, and supported. This would include: 4.3.1 regular experimentation with new teaching methods; and, |
4.1.01a - New Program Proposal Management Report – CVT |
Criterion 5 |
||
Human, physical, financial, and support resources to support student achievement of program learning outcomes are available and accessible. |
5.1 Teaching staff involved in the program: 5.1.1 meet the needs of the students and facilitate the achievement of the program learning outcomes; 5.2 Teaching staff execute their professional responsibilities including, and not limited to: 5.2.1 working within clear and well-structured instructional plans; 5.3 Learning facilities (including learning Resource Centres) and equipment support the promised modes of delivery and the learning process. 5.4 Academic support and advising services meet the needs of the students and facilitate the achievement of the program learning outcomes. 5.5 Leadership, organization, and management of programs, include: 5.5.1 optimization of human resources, learning resources, and facilities; |
5.1.01 - Recruitment and Selection Policy |
Criterion 6 |
||
Regular program quality assessment that involves faculty, students, industry representatives, and others as appropriate for the purpose of continual improvement is in place and happens. |
6.1 The college has implemented a program quality management system that identifies and rectifies weaknesses, and facilitates the evolution of the program to maintain its relevance. This includes: 6.1.1 a process 6.2 Documentation and other evidence arising from program quality management processes is maintained and used in ongoing quality management. 6.3 Graduates, employers, students, and other stakeholders indicate satisfaction with the program. |
6.1.01 - Program Review Overview |